Where Sentinel
stands today

Phase 1 · Complete
Environmental baseline

25 years of data across five fault zones. Pre-registered and filed.

Phase 2 · In progress
A harder benchmark

One region, measured against the forecasting models seismologists already use.

Every result published
Five results filed

Null and exploratory alike, on OSF and GitHub. See results →

Project Sentinel five fault zones

Five fault zones · Cascadia · Japan Trench · North Anatolian · Central Chile · Sumatra-Andaman

The long-term goal: a probabilistic platform across all six FEMA hazard categories, built to improve risk awareness and help protect lives.

For researchers
The full technical plan

Methodology, data sources, design principles, evidence hierarchy, risks, and the phase roadmap.

Research Hub →

A harder bar,
the same discipline

Sentinel's work to date has been pseudo-prospective: chronological walk-forward validation on historical data, with the model never permitted to see the future of its test window. That structure stays. What changes is the baseline it gets compared against.

QuestionInitial approachNext phase
Question askedDoes this signal separate pre-event from non-event windows better than chance?Does this signal improve a forecast a seismologist would already accept?
BaselineA fixed statistical threshold (a seismic-only feature model)ETAS and smoothed seismicity
MetricAUROC, ranking onlyInformation gain, calibrated probability
Model outputA score over a windowA probability for each grid cell and time bin

Earthquakes cluster in space and time, so a feature that merely tracks an active period in an active place can look predictive while adding nothing a standard forecasting model did not already know. A benchmark built from ETAS and smoothed seismicity already contains everything the field gets for free. Raising the bar to this standard is what lets a genuine signal be told apart from a pattern the field already expected.

Probabilistic
forecasting

01
Define the Target
A single target region. Fix grid cell size, time bin, magnitude threshold, and forecast horizon. Everything downstream inherits this geometry.
02
Build and Validate the Benchmark
ETAS and smoothed seismicity from the existing catalog, structured in floatCSEP. Confirmed against known regional behavior before anything external is introduced.
03
Characterize the Data
Coverage, cadence, gaps, pierce-point sampling, receiver bias, and confound magnitude for the target region, on predictor data only. No reference to the event catalog at this stage.
04
Literature Specification
Adopt two or three published TEC/LAIC constructions, so independence is built into the construction itself.
Sequencing principle
Use the full record for testing wherever possible. Let the literature define specifications; use data characterization only to judge whether the measurement can support the test.
05
Forecasting Review
Is the benchmark implemented correctly, and is the comparison fair? Checked against standard forecast-evaluation statistics.
06
Ionospheric Review
Is the slant TEC processed correctly, and is the published specification implemented faithfully? Checked against standard GNSS-TEC processing practice.
07
Pre-Register and Run
Every hypothesis specified as benchmark vs. benchmark-plus-stream. Locked and timestamped through the existing custody chain.
08
Score and Publish
Information gain against the benchmark. Positive or null, reported either way, with the same documentation standard.

Communicating
initial results

Two initial analyses are complete with writeups in progress: A dedicated Phase 2 null-results paper covering the pre-registered hypotheses and walk-forward evaluation, centered on a fold that returned an initial AUROC of 0.900 before failing to sustain under the pre-registered protocol and being correctly scored null. And a separate methods paper on the superposed-epoch post-event finding, following a novelty search to confirm it hasn't already been described elsewhere. Both will be filed to OSF and GitHub alongside the results already on the For Researchers page.

The upgrade over
gridded TEC maps

The earlier ionospheric analysis relied on the best available global maps at the time. Higher-fidelity, receiver-level TEC data is now accessible, offering a genuine upgrade in measurement quality for this phase.

Madrigal / MIT Haystack
Line-of-sight slant GNSS TEC with pierce points, roughly 30-second cadence, from 6,000+ receivers globally, continuous since 2000. The genuine upgrade over the gridded IONEX maps used in the H3 analysis.
Open · registration required · HDF5
EarthScope / NOTA
1,200+ continuous instruments across 20+ countries: multi-constellation GNSS, borehole strain, seismic, and tilt. Custom high-rate requests available for specific sites and periods.
Free for noncommercial scientific use
NASA CDDIS
High-rate GNSS observation data at 1-second sampling, global coverage, available from 2001 forward.
Open access

Design Principles

One Region
Five zones multiply the work and reintroduce the multiplicity problem. With several zones, streams, and folds in play, the maximum across all cells looks impressive even when nothing real is there. The method gets proven in one place first.
Literature Specification
Turning raw slant TEC into a single number requires hundreds of decisions. A specification chosen partly because it performed well is exactly the property that makes a specification untrustworthy. A published specification was fixed by someone else before any outcome was seen, which forecloses any accusation of tuning.
Data Characterization
Predictors may be examined freely: coverage, gaps, receiver density, confound structure. The moment the relationship between a predictor and the outcome is examined, evidentiary value has been spent. That line is held explicitly.
Benchmarks Before Streams
ETAS and smoothed seismicity require only the existing earthquake catalog, no new dependencies. The forecast geometry gets fixed when the benchmark is built, and every stream is processed into that same shape a single time.

Stated before any
external party is asked

Every hypothesis is pre-registered and locked before any result is examined, with no post-hoc changes to success criteria.
Every forecast is logged prospectively, before the outcome is known, so nothing is scored with the benefit of hindsight.
Evidence at every tier, from established seismicity models to precognition reports, is evaluated according to its own epistemic standing, never pooled into a single score.
Null and contradictory results are reported with the same rigor as positive ones.

Six tiers,
never pooled together

Every stream Sentinel touches sits somewhere on a hierarchy from established science to open research hypothesis. Each tier is scored against its own standard of evidence, and none is allowed to borrow credibility from another.

Core Baseline
Seismicity rates · spatial patterns · aftershock statistics
Established forecasting information.
Primary Experimental
GNSS / strain · b-value / catalog features
Physically grounded, with short-term forecasting skill still developing.
Contested Geophysics
TEC · EM · thermal · atmospheric / geochemical
An actively conflicting, confound-heavy literature.
Structured Human Data
Dreams · intuition reports · anomalous cognition inventories
Phenomenology that can be structured, with anomalous information content still unestablished.
High-Uncertainty HAC
Precognition · presentiment · remote viewing
Positive claims that coexist with significant replication failures.
Cross-Domain Convergence
Geophysical + HAC incremental information
Unestablished. This tier is Sentinel's own research hypothesis, stated openly as such.
A measurable stream is not automatically a predictive stream.

Challenges and
mitigation steps

Implementation risk
Building ETAS correctly, parameter estimation, spatial and temporal kernels, background rate, is the step most likely to overrun its estimate and most likely to contain a subtle error. A self-validation gate exists specifically to catch this before anything downstream depends on it.
Expected outcome
Most streams are expected to return null against the benchmark. The plan is designed around that outcome, and every null gets the same publication treatment as a positive result.
Measurement risk
Slant TEC processing can be wrong invisibly. Receiver bias and elevation-angle mapping are the usual failure points, which is exactly what the ionospheric review step exists to catch.

Earthquakes first,
expansion next

The strategy adapts at each phase. Null results redirect the plan; confirmed signals accelerate it.

12026 · complete
Environmental Baseline
Earthquakes only
  • Solar/geomagnetic vs. seismic
  • 25-year backfill complete
  • AUROC evaluation
  • Pre-registered null confirmed
22026 · in progress
Single-Region Convergence
Earthquakes only
  • One validated region
  • 7 data streams
  • Benchmarked against ETAS
  • GPS + high-fidelity TEC
32027
Convergence Engine
Earthquakes only
  • Multi-stream scoring
  • Extension to remaining fault zones
  • Probabilistic output
  • No deterministic prediction
42027–28
Multi-Hazard Expansion
All hazards
  • Tsunami ground truth
  • Volcanic catalog
  • Flood / landslide
  • Shared ingestion
52027–28
HAC Integration
Protocol TBD
  • Convergence result informs design
  • HAC protocol design
  • Structured intake
  • Prospective only
62028+
Institutional Collaboration
If signal exists
  • Academic partnership
  • Independent replication
  • Grant funding
  • Federal agency engagement
7Vision
Operational Prototype
Probabilistic
  • Live monitoring
  • Bounded risk signals
  • Calibrated uncertainty
  • Every forecast logged
Earthquakes
USGS ComCat
350K+ events
Phases 1–3 active
Tsunamis
NOAA NGDC
Inherits EQ infra
DART buoys
Volcanoes
Smithsonian GVP
USGS networks
SO₂ satellites
Floods
NOAA gauges
NWS alerts
Atmospheric rivers
Landslides
NASA global catalog
SMAP soil moisture
Precipitation
Avalanches
SNOTEL snowpack
Regional centers
Temp + precip
Long-term vision
A single probabilistic platform covering all six FEMA hazard categories: bounded risk signals, calibrated uncertainty, and every forecast logged before the outcome is known. A tool meant to increase risk awareness, inform decisions, and help protect lives.

Explore the
other initiatives

One of four Synexis initiatives, all held to the same standard.